Welcome to iVillage.co.uk! or Join our Community

Want more iVillage? Sign up for our NEWSLETTERS
iVillage logo

Susanne Remic is a primary school teacher, freelance writer and parenting blogger. She writes at Ghostwritermummy and Maternity Matters and in between all of that she regularly wins mummy of the year awards for running around after her two children, aged six and 19 months. This is her pregnancy blog: an online diary of her third pregnancy as she strives to overcome two difficult births, one angel child and one awkward toddler. Join Susanne as she shares every step of her journey from bump to baby!

 

 

High-risk pregnancy?

By Susanne Remic on 07 Oct 2011 6 comments

I’ve been told, once more, that this is a high-risk pregnancy. This time, it probably means nothing more than a few more ante-natal appointments with my community midwife and a couple of extra meetings with my consultant. It might mean that my notes are read a little more carefully but it might not.

I was high risk last time too, and it didn’t seem to make much of a difference to the level of care I received. In fact, the only time I was made aware that I was high risk was the night that I went into labour. I’d called the ward to let them know I was contracting and was asked to come in to be examined, since I was ‘high risk’.

High risk? Yes. Apparently, a previous section- emergency or not- gives you that label and means a hospital visit at the very slightest hint of contractions, since the biggest risk is the scar rupturing.

At the hospital, I was told that I wasn’t actually in labour but that I was to be admitted onto the ward. Once again, that ‘high risk’ label was being thrown around in conversation and I reluctantly agreed that they must have my best interests at heart. I said goodbye to my husband and was admitted to the ward.

So, ‘high risk’ obviously meant that they wanted to keep an eye on me, right? You would think so. Instead, the poor understaffed midwives were forced to leave me alone for hours, contracting and frightened on the ward. After that initial examination at 4.30 am, I was left well alone until 2.30pm that afternoon. Unless you count the doctor who hovered by the end of my bed and told me contractions that were six minutes apart meant nothing. I was not in labour, yet I still could not go home.

At around 2pm, I could take the pain no more and I was really scared. My poor husband followed helplessly as I continually shuffled up and down the corridor, clutching onto the walls until my knuckles turned white and sobbing in pain. My husband helped me into the loo and as I was exiting, a midwife came to tell him off for using the facilities. Before he could explain, she noticed the distress that I was in and offered to examine me. I was in labour and I needed to get down to delivery, since I was ‘high risk’.

My question is this: if I was high risk, why was I left alone for so long? If I was high risk, why were my fears and concerns over things going wrong never addressed? If I was high risk, why was I not examined for ten hours? If I was high risk, why did I feel like I was at the bottom of the list of priorities that day?

Being given that same ‘high risk’ label this time means nothing to me. I have two c-section scars that may rupture, but I also have the comfort of knowing that I will be having my planned section before I go into labour.

See also:

FILED UNDER:

Comments

Actually pregnancy and delivery is not a risky one. If one has proper aspects for that she can easily become a mother. This is my thoughtPregnancy week by week
I too had a similar situation and after being induced early due to having the pregnancy condition OC, I was left on a high risk ward without being checked despite my complaints I was in labour soon after induction. Finally checking me hours later, they found my baby was distressd and I was rushed to theatre for an emergency C section I might well have not needed if only I was better monitored early as expressed. Thing HAVE to change.
I would like to share our story with you. It's a short video of our vba3c journey: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpCZQw8fZGg I hope that you find it helpful and that it encourages you to consider researching the option of a VBAC. I had a 99+% chance of a successful vaginal birth even after have 3 previous c-sections. The information is out there for you to read it if you wish. The International Cesarean Awareness Network is a great resource for tons and tons of information. You can visit there website at incan-online.org and find a support group near you. There are healthcare providers, hospitals and birthcenters who are VBAC friendly and ICAN can help you find them. I wish the best for you, your baby, pregnancy and birth! Be blessed!
+, hello susanne! i am dc from indonesia, yes it's 3rd world country. i gave birth vaginally after a c-section. http://dcgloria.blogspot.com/ your doctor lied to you, i think. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpCZQw8fZGg please join us in ican-online.org! take care, love, dc+
I had a c-seitonwith my first birth and not one of my future pregnancies was considered 'high risk'. I had an external version preformed in my next two pregnancies, must have had some CRAZY doctors to do such a procedure on a 'scarred uterus' that was just waiting to rupture. I have had 4 VBAC (vaginal birth after ceserean) babies. Even with two previous surgical births, you are NOT high risk, and could if you wanted to safely deliver this baby vaginally. This is not saying you should change your mind, just that your midwife and consultant are really not up to date on modern medicine.
I didn't know about the high risk label. That means my future pregnancies will Be too and there's something uneasy about that. I hope you don't go through the same experience as last couple of times and that it's plain sailing for you. I think you are more prepared though mentally because you've been through it before and have already taken steps to change things like the hospital. Hopefully these steps will make it a positive experience for you.