Parenting 

Advertisement

TV or not TV?

Despite the popularity of the Internet, television is still the most popular medium for kids and can occupy up to 13.9 hours of a child's time each week according to Ofcom (Office of Communications)

Jo Frost, star of Channel 4's Supernanny, agrees. She says: 'Children are spending more time in front of the TV, whether it's playing games or watching DVDs. The TV is even being used as a babysitter.'

These days TV is being blamed for a host of kids' problems, from ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder) to hindering their academic development. But is it really that bad or can TV in the right doses be beneficial and educational?

Does TV help or hinder?

In April 2007, Dr Aric Sigman, an associate fellow of the British Psychological Society, recommended that children's viewing be rationed to help reduce learning and health problems. He prescribes no TV at all for under-threes; 30 minutes to one hour for three to seven-year-olds; one hour for seven to 12-year-olds; one and a half hours for 12 to 16-year-olds and two hours for 16-year-olds and over, per day.

A report in the New Scientist in July 2005 said the quality of what children watch on TV may even influence academic achievement. The report, based on research by the American Academy of Paediatrics, recommends that children watch a maximum of two hours of TV per day and that children under two years old watch none at all.

Another US study published in the Archives of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine (July 2005) found that children aged around eight years with a TV in their bedroom showed a weaker performance in their school tests than pupils without a TV in their room.

But some argue that certain educational programmes can encourage important cognitive development. A report entitled Can television be good for children? by Dr Kaoruko Kondo from the University of Westminster's Communication and Media Research Institute, says children can develop different types of skills through watching television.

It states: 'As children acquire more experience of television, their ability to comprehend its content and translate those meanings into learning increases.'

Jo Frost agrees that TV is not to blame for childhood problems, adding: 'The TV doesn't have arms and legs. It serves a purpose for entertainment and education. What we really need to ask ourselves is "what is the TV disguising?" Are we using it because we struggle with activity ideas and interaction or is it lazy behaviour, replacing the times we could be creative with our kids?

'Dr Sigman has recognised that parents are abusing TV viewing but it is about balance. Don't be regimental or create a 'nanny state', be responsible. The time spent watching TV replaces human interaction and the time children can learn from their parents.'

Liz Attenborough, manager of the National Literacy Trust's Talk to Your Baby campaign, says: 'We wanted to know if television really is to blame for the difficulties in communication that many young children seem to have when they arrive in school.

'What we found is that there are many social and cultural factors that have an impact, but that in the right circumstances television may be useful for young children's language development.

'Television has been part of our popular culture for over 50 years and continues to be so, and by itself is neither the cause nor the answer to language issues. What is important is that parents and carers are aware of the pros and cons of TV watching and maximise the opportunities while diminishing potential risks.'

Delicious     Digg     reddit     Facebook     StumbleUpon

  Get the latest iVillage news on your desktop    Sign up for more iVillage RSS feeds

© iVillage Limited 2000-2008. All rights reserved. | © iVillage inc. 1995-2008. All rights reserved.
iVillage Ltd is a UK company registered in England & Wales (3837269) at 80-110 New Oxford Street, London WC1 1HB