| Keep it casual?
It wasn't always this way - even a generation ago, casual sex was relatively unknown for women. Men could sleep around and be regarded as 'sowing their wild oats' without a hint of criticism. But a woman who had casual sex was, and often still is, more likely to be labelled a 'slag' and seen as 'unnatural'. In fact, it isn't necessarily natural for women to only want committed or involved sex. Yes, when we get broody we're likely to head for a stable relationship in order to get support for parenting, but geneticists now believe that in general, girls and guys are equally up for quick and uninvolved liaisons in order to spread their seed around to best effect. The idea that women 'shouldn't' when men 'can' isn't instinctive at all. It comes from the fact that over the millennia, society has closed ranks to discourage women from casual sex. Dominant males, keen to ensure that it was their baby their women was bearing and not their mate's, have traditionally policed female sexuality, putting on the legal, moral and social pressure. Result - we feel guilt where the guys don't.
So why the change? Women also have fewer inhibitions nowadays. In particular, female drinking figures are rocketing, and alcohol makes it much more likely that we'll have sex with a companion even if we've only known them a few hours. Plus, we have more motivation. Women are living an increasingly demanding life and need sex to lower our stress levels, to comfort us, to make us feel more secure. If we haven't got a regular partner, we see no reason not to take an 'irregular' one. Plus, that avoids the problems and responsibilities that only a committed relationship brings. It's also that nowadays, we women are more up for excitement, adventure and risk. We want to feel alive and the rush of sex with a stranger gives us that feeling, stimulating our sympathetic nervous system, pumping up our adrenaline and putting our bodies on a sense of high alert. No wonder casual sex can feel more exciting than a regular Saturday night session with a regular partner. All of which explains why, in a survey in the States commissioned by the Oprah Winfrey Show, 50 per cent of respondents said that casual sex was worth it. They thought it exciting, enjoyable - and a statement of their sexual identity, a reflection of the fact that as a 21st century woman, they wanted to be free to have sex when and with whom they wanted.
The backlash Particularly if we're older, particularly if we're broody, particularly if we're using casual sex as a stopgap until Mr Right comes along, we can find it difficult to walk away from someone we've had sex with - even when he's a stranger we've only just met. This isn't just conditioning; that we've been brought up to believe in the concept of love and sex going hand in hand. It's that physiologically, sex creates a flood of hormones that naturally create a bond. Oxytocin (the same hormone that women release while breastfeeding) makes us feel close to a partner and dopamine makes us feel content in his company, both of which are released during sex. So before casual sex we were clear-headed, sure that we could walk away with no regrets. After sex we may suddenly feel involved, emotionally intimate whether we like it or not - and whether it's wise or not. There is, of course, an added sting in the tale - that our partner may not have suffered the same shift of emotions. He, with his different conditioning, may be able to ignore the prompting of his hormones and remain uncommitted. We feel betrayed that he's walking away. He feels wrong-footed that we're reneging on the original, uninvolved deal. Result? Casual sex may simply be a bad idea for us because it can create feelings that we can't control - not to mention needs that we cannot meet.
Should you or shouldn't you? But if you're in any doubt, think about these questions. A 'yes' answer suggests that casual sex can work for you, a 'no' answer that - at this point in your life - it won't.
Making it work for you
Further reading |