Welcome to iVillage.co.uk! or Join our Community

Want more iVillage? Sign up for our NEWSLETTERS
iVillage logo

Our straight talking Lancashire lass takes a sideways look at the daily news.

 

Welfare reforms = money for old rope

By Sian Claire Owen on 22 Jan 2012 2 comments

Today Parliament will clash over Welfare Reforms that will see benefits capped at £26,000 every year. That’s the equivalent to £35,000 before tax. That’s a helluva lot of money.

This comes as public sector workers face payment freezes until 2020.

Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith is desperate for the House of Lords to pass his deeply unpopular reform bill. Lord Paddy Ashdown, former Lib Dem leader and total James Bond character believes that the proposed system will push millions into poverty and the changes to child benefit will affect children badly. As president of UNICEF I can see where he’s coming from.

I’ve got mixed feelings about this. North East Lancashire is an area that, despite its rural beauty, has always had big pockets of deep social deprivation. But it is an area of great innovation too – it’s the birthplace of the Industrial Revolution (something which I’m very proud of!).

But every day I see hoards of people – entire families – milling around the town centre. They sit around on the benches, eating fast food, smoking and chatting - then they will migrate to the pubs in the evening. Or they’ll buy cheap booze and stay at home. Of course this is a generalisation, but I don’t think it’s too far off the mark.

Yet I don’t look at these people and see layabouts. I see waste. Wasted resources and wasted potential. Because these people are actively encouraged to stay on benefits – they receive more money in handouts than my annual income. It’s unfair on me as a tax payer, and it’s unfair on them because they are conditioned to rely on handouts and as such will never lead meaningful lives.

The benefits culture is a trap, and the generous handouts are an incentive for people to live idle lives. Believe me, there are many, many people who know how to screw the system and get as much money as possible.

The welfare system should only be there to help people who really need it. I don’t know what the future holds for me, but I’d like to think that if I was unfortunate enough to be struck with illness, or work runs dry, that I could rely on the state to see me through until I was back on my feet.

But never in a million years would I ever consider benefits as a lifestyle choice. And for that reason I believe these reforms make sense.

Now if the government could invest the same energy in developing education and opportunity the world would be a better place!

IMAGE CREDITS:
  • Getty Images,
FILED UNDER:

Comments

Oh dear, sounds like someone's been reading the Daily Mail. Of course there are people who cheat the benefits system but there are more sophisticated ways of tackling them (if there's a will to do it). This is just another step by the Tories to persecute the weakest, poorest and most vulnerable in a society that has been created by the wealthy and greedy. Are they going after the bankers? No. Are they going after the billionaires who don't pay tax? No. But it's very convenient to be able to lay the blame at the doors of a few benefits cheats (who in reality cost a fraction of the unpaid tax bill of big business in the UK). So we'll push even more people even further into poverty while Cameron's mates from Eton laud it up on their yachts. Rule Britannia!
Hi Felix - I agree with many of your points, and I think the amendment of the bill to exclude child benefits is a good thing. You're right in that is it disgusting that the government seem to be doing nothing more to the bankers than slapping them on the wrist with a damp tea bag. My point is that the generations of families on benefit is a wider social issue that desperately needs to be tackled. No-one should lead an idle life, and the benefits system should only serve those who genuinely need it. I didn't add in the blog, but I believe that the money that they save in reducing benefit should go directly into investing in education, training and opportunity to redress these problems - there is little point in capping benefits and then not offering a hand out of the swamp, so to speak.