iVillage logo
Work & Money 
Advertisement
Topics
iVillage shopping

Hot stuff
Newsletters
sign up for FREE!




 
Promotions

What kind of emailer are you?

by Matt Beaumont
continued from page 1
Exactly
Now that email has been with us for a while a number of literary styles have evolved. Not all of them are good. In fact, some of them are crap. But you wouldn’t walk into a bookshop and expect to like every title on offer, so why should your inbox be packed with rattling good reads?

These e-types slot neatly into categories. Here’s a handy, cut-out-and-trash guide to the typical office emailer, be they good, mad or plug-ugly.

Norman e. Mailer
He would have a Booker, if only the literary world would look up from their Ivy main courses and take notice. Email is the perfect outlet for all that pent-up creativity. His maxim is ‘why use one word when fifty will do?’

He can turn a mundane report on the weekly meeting of the Purchasing Practices Steering Committee into something Proustian – long, profound and quite moving in parts but, frankly, an utter waste of kilobytes. If you must wade through his self-indulgent verbiage, console yourself with the fact that at least you haven’t paid £14.99 for it in Waterstones.

And-e McNab
He would be happier in the SAS but, damn it, the company needs him. He does the work of ten and succeeds in spite of the wishy-washy ineptitude around him. He operates alone and usually lunches at his desk on a bag of Salt ‘n’ Lineker and a Kit-Kat. Sandwich bars are for wimps. His emails are concise to the point of making little sense at all and make liberal use of

  • bullet points
  • to create
  • the illusion of
  • mercilessly efficient
  • management
  • of a brutally
  • heavy
  • work load.


 previous 1 |  2 |  3 4 next print printer friendly send to a friend
Created: 19/02/2004  Updated: 19/02/2004
Delicious     Digg     reddit     Facebook     StumbleUpon